New LaptopThe Macbook Air I was previously using for my personal projects is now retired. I have brought it to the office for playing music from local files and streaming services through equalization and crossfeed plugins. That's an interesting topic on its own, and I will do a post about it some time later.
I decided that my new laptop needs to run Windows, because it seems to be the operating system of choice for audio engineers. Indeed, on Mac I had to use FuzzMeasure and REW which are designed primarily for acoustical measurements. Whereas for PCs there are plenty of software packages for electrical audio measurements that work with regular sound cards. Potentially, one can run them on Mac via emulation, but my attempts of trying that usually resulted in crashes and hangs.
While looking for Windows laptop I faced the harsh truth—Macbooks are such a good laptops that finding a matching Windows machine is a challenge. The usual weak point is quality of screens and touchpads. After considering several cheaper laptop models I decided to bite the bullet and buy Lenovo X1 Carbon, 5th generation. I have a 4th generation Carbon as company-provided Linux laptop, and I almost enjoy it for its small weight and durability. "Almost" due to the touchpad—it's not very good. In fact, I prefer to use the "red dot" joystick controller instead.
In comparison with the 4th generation, its successor adds a high resolution screen, USB-C ports, and newer Intel chipsets. The touchpad is also a bit better. And the laptops are now available in silver body color in addition to the classic black.
Here it is. It is even lighter than Macbook Air, and the screen is better—the bezels are very thin, and the resolution is impressive 2550 x 1440 on a 14" diagonal (the 27" monitors I have at my office use the same resolution). The IPS matrix provides very wide viewing angles. 5th gen Carbon even beats Apple laptops in connectivity as it has both USB-A and USB-C type ports, and HDMI.
From the hardware design point of view the only annoying thing is the absence of a notch on the lower part of the body, which makes it hard to open the laptop's lid using one hand only—the habit I earned over the years of using MB Air. In fact, opening the lid even using two hands is not that comfortable because the the material that the body is made of is a bit slippery.
But the most annoying feature in the new laptop is the operating system. Carbon comes with Windows 7 Pro preinstalled and I decided not to upgrade it to Windows 10 yet because I was hoping that I could use my old E-MU cards: Tracker Pre and 0404 (they are not fully USB Audio compatible, and Creative Labs eventually has stopped releasing new drivers for them.) Windows 7 feels complicated and cumbersome even compared to modern Linux graphical desktops, let alone Macs.
Speaking of E-MU drivers, Creative Labs has abandoned them in beta status for Windows 7 64-bit, and it really shows itself. I can configure the cards, but when trying to use audio analyzer apps the system hangs.
Windows Audio AnalyzersI tried ARTA, AudioTester, and the package from Virtins. AudioTester looks a bit outdated, and it wasn't stable enough. The MultiInstrument package from Virtins seems to be designed more like an oscilloscope replacement. ARTA appeared as the best choice—it was easy enough to figure out how to make the measurements I needed even without the manual, and when I looked into the manual I was pleasantly astonished that descriptions of all measurements are accompanied with the underlying DSP theory.
The only thing I haven't yet figured out completely (and it seems more like a problem with Windows 7 rather than with ARTA) is how to use my MOTU Microbook IIc with 96 kHz sampling rate. So by far, I was making all my measurements in 48 kHz mode.
MOTU Line Out to Line In Loopback
I started with a simple loopback from MOTU's unbalanced Line Out to its balanced Line In. I used unbalanced out because this is the out I can use throughout the entire experiment (not all amplifiers have a balanced line in.) I shorted the balanced cold input (ring on TRS) to the ground—this was resulting in less noise than leaving it floating. The laptop was running on battery. This is how THD, IMD, and Frequency response (FR) graphs of the loopback connection look like:
Soundcard Interface Loopback
Now these are measurements of a loopback through P. Millet's Soundcard Interface (SCI). I have connected MOTU's unbalanced line out to SCI's input, ground referenced. SCI's input range was set to 2V. I powered SCI from the second USB-A port of my laptop. Potentially, this could introduce a ground loop noise, but it didn't—the ground loop noise usually looks like a spike at 60 Hz as we will see later.
Here the overall noise floor has raised by about 10 dB, but it's interesting that the 2nd and 3rd harmonics have disappeared. Since the input level is the same, perhaps they were resulting from a slight overloading of MOTU's Line Out. The frequency response didn't change compared to MOTU loopback.
From these measurements I can conclude that Mr. Millet has created a highly transparent device. Hopefully, my extensive efforts on making a properly shielded and grounded case have also helped.
The next thing I have tried was using different power sources for the SCI: a USB power bank, the USB-C ports of laptop, and a multi-voltage switching power supply. The power bank is as clean as USB-A, and for the last two sources the results are below:
As we can see, the USB-C port indeed creates a ground loop (note the spike at 60 Hz and its harmonics), and the wall power supply is the worst.
SPL Phonitor Mini
Next step—try SPL Phonitor Mini. I have connected MOTU's unbalanced Line Out to Phonitor's unbalanced inputs, then connected the dummy headphone load I've made a long time ago to Phonitor's output via my T-Cable. Then using a BNC to banana males I have connected needle multimeter probes to the T-Cable's outlet. This way I have created a parallel connection for the Soundcard Interface to the dummy load.
I have set the dummy load to 33 Ohms, and turned up Phonitor's volume until the reading on the SCI was showing 1 V. The signal level in ARTA for the 1 kHz sine was showing the same RMS value as in my previous experiment. So now we can directly compare to SCI's loopback.
The level of noise remains the same—I think, Phonitor's noise level is lower than SCI's. There are more harmonics seen, this is expected for a power amplifier, so the overall THD numbers have raised. The frequency response didn't change compared to original MOTU Loopback measurement which means Phonitor has a flat response.
MOTU's Headphone Output
Now if we want to distinguish between a good and a bad headphone amplifier, let's measure the headphone output on the MOTU Microbook. Here we see much more distortions. Also, even on the maximum volume, MOTU's headphone output could only deliver 0.65 V into the same 33 Ohms load, whereas Phonitor while delivering 1 V wasn't even at the middle of its volume knob range.